Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - TehGratest

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 14
16
Fantasy Wrestling / Re: Official 2011-12 Draft
« on: October 25, 2011, 05:27:42 AM »
Sorry about that guys.  Didn't think I'd come up again since it seemed stalled for awhile there.  I turned in for the night pretty early.  Being teh gratest can be exhausting..

anywho...I"ll take Mario Mason.

17
Fantasy Wrestling / Re: Official 2011-12 Draft
« on: October 24, 2011, 07:02:51 PM »
Cold blooded.  Cross your fingers Rasing slips ;)

18
Fantasy Wrestling / Re: Official 2011-12 Draft
« on: October 24, 2011, 06:58:00 PM »
Nobody heard from cicero?

19
Fantasy Wrestling / Re: Official 2011-12 Draft
« on: October 24, 2011, 02:36:12 PM »
Kyle Dake

20
Fantasy Wrestling / Re: League Draft Order
« on: October 19, 2011, 07:10:31 PM »
If we can keep someone, do we have to keep them in the first round?  I had some great picks last year late, but they wouldn't really be first round material guys(Devin Carter, Mario Mason, James Fleming)  Can we keep them a few rounds ahead of where they were selected last year?

21
Fantasy Wrestling / Re: League Draft Order
« on: October 18, 2011, 08:49:07 PM »

22
Fantasy Wrestling / Re: League Draft Order
« on: October 18, 2011, 11:57:14 AM »
Are we allowed to trade draft position?

23
Fantasy Wrestling / Re: 2012 Fanasy league
« on: October 01, 2011, 07:20:12 PM »
I agree herb.

24
Fantasy Wrestling / Re: 2012 Fanasy league
« on: October 01, 2011, 10:45:09 AM »
I don't think anyone logged on, said they were ready to post, and then proceeded to take an hour to pick.

What holds you up is when people aren't right by a computer.  That's no big deal, and thats why we are drafting when we are and we will have plenty of time to complete it as long as everyone does their best to check the boards frequently. 

25
Fantasy Wrestling / Re: 2012 Fanasy league
« on: September 29, 2011, 09:59:54 PM »
Once you are AWARE it is your pick I think 10 minutes should be adequate .

That is pure insanity.

Who is going to be able to judge when someone is aware?  Just because a person is made aware doesn't make them aware.

3 hours is fair considering we have so much time.  Obviously if you can pick faster do it, but some(most) of us work during the day and have responsibilities in the evening.  Therefore, people won't be able to get on here and post the picks right away.

26
Fantasy Wrestling / Re: 2012 Fanasy league
« on: September 28, 2011, 07:18:30 AM »
Earlier the better please.  I'm not going to be available Oct 20-23 and I DON"T want to hold up the draft.
                                           
   

27
Fantasy Wrestling / Re: Rule change #3
« on: September 17, 2011, 02:17:07 PM »
How many potential add/drops would be allowed Akin?  I voted yes, btw.

28
Fantasy Wrestling / Re: Rule changes?
« on: September 16, 2011, 07:06:25 AM »
I still think we should weight it based on how difficult the weight is at that conference tourney.

So your suggestion is to rank every weight of every conference?

That won't get confusing and/or subjective.

I don't think much needs to be changed from last year personally.

29
Fantasy Wrestling / Re: Rule changes?
« on: September 15, 2011, 07:21:15 AM »
So do you have a good option?

Leave it as is.  Same bonus for Big 10 and Big 12.  There was nothing wrong with the rule last year, and as was previously pointed out, not much has changed as far as how many matches will be wrestled at Big 12's. 

Big 10 champs will have a nice advantage over Big 12 by the extra match(es) they will get to wrestle. 

Again: This doesn't mean the Big 12 is as tough or "equal" to the Big 10.  Just like the EIWA isn't t the equal of the So Con.  But they do have equal point values in their conference tournament.

30
Fantasy Wrestling / Re: Rule changes?
« on: September 14, 2011, 09:17:30 PM »
TG, I respect your opinion but I disagree.  The Big12 is simply not as deep and tough, and therefore the bonus should not be worth as much. 

You use 125, as an example which is fine.  That is a pretty tough weight in the big 12, but look at 141 for example and you only have 2 ranked wrestlers.  None of them higher than 10th. 

149 in the Big 12 you have Jamal Parks (4) and Matt Lester (18).  Should Parks really get the same bonus as Molinaro (1) who to win the tournament would have to beat or place above Lopouchanski (8), Grajales (9), Ness (10), Terrazas (12), Iowa Guy (13), and Schmitt (16). 

No way, no how should Big 12 bonus be as much as the big 10.  At many weights the EIWA will be much harder to win than the Big 12.

You're missing the point, which is probably why you disagree.

On that note, I digress.

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 14