Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - FiveWords

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 7
16
Evolution(?) / Re: How Life Emerged From Deap Sea Rocks
« on: January 12, 2013, 11:21:12 AM »
Why constantly label people Sparky?

17
Evolution(?) / Re: How Life Emerged From Deap Sea Rocks
« on: January 06, 2013, 03:50:22 PM »
Sorry  OC.  I'll pull myself back in. Maybe I should look into a profile so I can avoid breaking my own rules.

18
Evolution(?) / Re: How Life Emerged From Deap Sea Rocks
« on: January 06, 2013, 03:45:12 PM »
While I'm likely more experienced and comfortable with this field, being that you have an engineering background I think you grasp the basic concepts--so I don't know why you'd even ask I post it. Newton's equations described gravity but he did not know what gravity is or why his equations worked. Einstein through his research with light and GR explains how gravity works through the single fabric concept of space-time.  We don't disagree do we?

19
Evolution(?) / Re: How Life Emerged From Deap Sea Rocks
« on: January 06, 2013, 02:47:29 PM »
Five Words 5 squared? *Chest tightens, vision blurs*

Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!

5^2. I'll watch it.

20
Evolution(?) / Re: How Life Emerged From Deap Sea Rocks
« on: January 06, 2013, 02:45:15 PM »
Even the greatest scientists cannot describe gravity

Newton did.

Einstein explained it.

21
Evolution(?) / Re: How Life Emerged From Deap Sea Rocks
« on: January 05, 2013, 12:08:24 PM »
I wouldn't say that humanity will never discover the exact origins of existence.  The science is still young, and there have already been rudimentary advancements in the something from nothing frontier, and that is assuming that nothing is even the default mode, considering that particular idea stems from a human perspective of existence, and the universe isn't all that interested in our perspective.  Nothing actually has a weight, so it is likely that when (if) there was nothing before the big bang, it was actually something that we just don't understand and can't measure.  Scientists have to learn how to think in ways that humans aren't used to thinking.  The big bang was the beginning of our universe (time) but that doesn't mean that what is beyond time had to have a beginning (and why would it if it is beyond time?).  It is already becoming more and more clear that there are probably different universes than ours, and they don't necessarily have to work the same way that ours does.

Common misconception is that the Big Bang (which wasn't a bang but that's a different topic) is meant to point to the moment of creation.

22
Polls / Re: TOM Member Who You Think Twice Before Messing With
« on: December 18, 2012, 06:54:50 AM »
He's only half

The other half is poodle. 

23
Evolution(?) / Re: Louisiana Spreading Ignorance onto It
« on: November 26, 2012, 03:18:25 PM »
This is only the second time I've intentionally deviated from my silly character on an open forum.  I'm not a creationist but a person of science. If we call string/m theory an actual theory then who can blame creationists for calling evolution a theory or blame creationist from likewise claim creationism is a valid competing theory? Science pretty much has it's own cupboard to clean before looking too far down our noses at creationists and their blind faith. Pointing out the occassional blunders (my opinion) by science won't change the arrogant bickering, but rational, educated people should be capable of rational and respectful discourse.

24
Evolution(?) / Re: Louisiana Spreading Ignorance onto It
« on: November 25, 2012, 11:50:45 AM »
They evolved into modern ones.

25
Evolution(?) / Re: Louisiana Spreading Ignorance onto It
« on: November 25, 2012, 11:24:49 AM »
 Agree. String theorists are wackos.

26
Evolution(?) / Re: Louisiana Spreading Ignorance onto It
« on: November 24, 2012, 01:17:57 PM »
It's a genuine scientific theory?

27
Evolution(?) / Re: Louisiana Spreading Ignorance onto It
« on: November 24, 2012, 10:27:36 AM »
Is it science or not?

28
Evolution(?) / Re: Louisiana Spreading Ignorance onto It
« on: November 24, 2012, 10:24:11 AM »
String theory is philosophy.  Agree?

29
Other Sports / Re: Holy Mary Full of Grace
« on: November 19, 2012, 07:38:30 PM »
They'll be crushed by Alabama.

30
Other Sports / Holy Mary Full of Grace
« on: November 19, 2012, 07:52:35 AM »
Norte Dame's in first place?

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 7