Author Topic: Champs next year  (Read 13781 times)

Offline vaisforlovers

  • World Silver
  • *****
  • Posts: 2169
    • View Profile
Re: Champs next year
« Reply #45 on: May 16, 2012, 11:43:49 AM »
Whoa buddy. I don't think that anyone was taking shots at you. They were just stating there opinions like you were in the original post.
It is hard to know at this point who will win each weight or even be at which weight.
I don't agree with all of your picks either but I don't think that they are out of line either. Just a matter of opinion at this point.

What?  Who did I say was taking shots?  Youre the only one getting excited...i am perfectly aware that we are all sharing our opinions.  Thats the point of these boards.
To avoid criticism say nothing, do nothing, be nothing.

Offline vaisforlovers

  • World Silver
  • *****
  • Posts: 2169
    • View Profile
Re: Champs next year
« Reply #46 on: May 16, 2012, 11:46:00 AM »
Am I the only one who thinks its nuts to discount Ruth because of his strength?  He was one of the most physically overpowering wrestlers in ncaas last year.  You really think he becomes a waif at 184.  Tell me you think his technique is bad, or that he is doesnt match up well, but strength?  Thats his biggest...strength!
To avoid criticism say nothing, do nothing, be nothing.

Offline ViseGrip

  • LXP
  • Get a Job
  • *
  • Posts: 35875
    • View Profile
Re: Champs next year
« Reply #47 on: May 16, 2012, 11:49:18 AM »
Mangrum at 141.
Mangrum cant even beat Maple much less JO
"The first lesson of economics is scarcity: There is never enough of anything to satisfy all that want it. The first lesson of politics is to disregard the first lesson of economics" -Thomas Sowell

Offline ViseGrip

  • LXP
  • Get a Job
  • *
  • Posts: 35875
    • View Profile
Re: Champs next year
« Reply #48 on: May 16, 2012, 11:50:04 AM »
Nobody wants to take Derek St John for the win at 157...
Not if Dake is there. 
"The first lesson of economics is scarcity: There is never enough of anything to satisfy all that want it. The first lesson of politics is to disregard the first lesson of economics" -Thomas Sowell

Offline Rockhard

  • LXP
  • Get a Job
  • *
  • Posts: 21051
    • View Profile
    • http://www.theowf.net
Re: Champs next year
« Reply #49 on: May 16, 2012, 11:50:15 AM »
Whoa, what about the rumor that Oliver is dropping to 125 and McTuna going 133?

Whoa, I hear Dake wants a piece of Ruth just to remind everyone why he's the best and when he doesn't win the Hodge, again, will give the entire NCAA tournament the finger.

Whoa, I also hear Z is moving back to Russia.

Whoa, Howe will likely transfer one more time and that school will be........Franklin and Marshall.

Whoa, Ness over Alton 23-22 in an OT thriller

Whoa, Perry transfers to Iowa.
"Really? Well please tell your father-in-law that he is a freaking idiot."

Offline Rockhard

  • LXP
  • Get a Job
  • *
  • Posts: 21051
    • View Profile
    • http://www.theowf.net
Re: Champs next year
« Reply #50 on: May 16, 2012, 11:52:58 AM »
Mangrum at 141.
Mangrum cant even beat Maple much less JO

JO needs to put some meat on his bones first.
"Really? Well please tell your father-in-law that he is a freaking idiot."

Offline ViseGrip

  • LXP
  • Get a Job
  • *
  • Posts: 35875
    • View Profile
Re: Champs next year
« Reply #51 on: May 16, 2012, 11:53:48 AM »
Howe will  beat Perry at 174.
"The first lesson of economics is scarcity: There is never enough of anything to satisfy all that want it. The first lesson of politics is to disregard the first lesson of economics" -Thomas Sowell

Offline The Du

  • LXP
  • I Need More Hobbies
  • *****
  • Posts: 4634
    • View Profile
    • http://www.theopenmat.com
Re: Champs next year
« Reply #52 on: May 16, 2012, 11:54:39 AM »
Am I the only one who thinks its nuts to discount Ruth because of his strength?  He was one of the most physically overpowering wrestlers in ncaas last year.  You really think he becomes a waif at 184.  Tell me you think his technique is bad, or that he is doesnt match up well, but strength?  Thats his biggest...strength!

i think that might be the point VA.

move up 10 lbs and now his strength (strength) is reduced.

he's still the most talented kid at the weight. and like i said, i'll still take him to win it all.

but it's sure not the tap in that it is at 74
...talking to myself cause im the only one worth consulting...

Offline ViseGrip

  • LXP
  • Get a Job
  • *
  • Posts: 35875
    • View Profile
Re: Champs next year
« Reply #53 on: May 16, 2012, 11:54:50 AM »
Mangrum at 141.
Mangrum cant even beat Maple much less JO

JO needs to put some meat on his bones first.

Hell he was Skelator last year, you really think he'll have problems filling out 141? Really?
"The first lesson of economics is scarcity: There is never enough of anything to satisfy all that want it. The first lesson of politics is to disregard the first lesson of economics" -Thomas Sowell

Offline ViseGrip

  • LXP
  • Get a Job
  • *
  • Posts: 35875
    • View Profile
Re: Champs next year
« Reply #54 on: May 16, 2012, 11:57:05 AM »
Am I the only one who thinks its nuts to discount Ruth because of his strength?  He was one of the most physically overpowering wrestlers in ncaas last year.  You really think he becomes a waif at 184.  Tell me you think his technique is bad, or that he is doesnt match up well, but strength?  Thats his biggest...strength!

i think that might be the point VA.

move up 10 lbs and now his strength (strength) is reduced.

he's still the most talented kid at the weight. and like i said, i'll still take him to win it all.

but it's sure not the tap in that it is at 74
I think Howe's defensive style will make this match very close if Ruth stays at 174.
"The first lesson of economics is scarcity: There is never enough of anything to satisfy all that want it. The first lesson of politics is to disregard the first lesson of economics" -Thomas Sowell

Offline Rockhard

  • LXP
  • Get a Job
  • *
  • Posts: 21051
    • View Profile
    • http://www.theowf.net
Re: Champs next year
« Reply #55 on: May 16, 2012, 12:12:21 PM »
Mangrum at 141.
Mangrum cant even beat Maple much less JO

JO needs to put some meat on his bones first.

Hell he was Skelator last year, you really think he'll have problems filling out 141? Really?

Muscle yes, body weight no.
"Really? Well please tell your father-in-law that he is a freaking idiot."

Offline brycemus

  • LXP
  • Get a Job
  • *
  • Posts: 32386
    • View Profile
Re: Champs next year
« Reply #56 on: May 16, 2012, 12:19:43 PM »
I'll take DSJ at 157 IF Dake isn't there.

yeah Ruth beat the crap out of 174lbers...guys like Steinhaus, Bosak, etc...they Don't weigh 174
Corey Clark: 2016-2017 Hawkeye Hammer

Offline ViseGrip

  • LXP
  • Get a Job
  • *
  • Posts: 35875
    • View Profile
Re: Champs next year
« Reply #57 on: May 16, 2012, 01:47:35 PM »
Mangrum at 141.
Mangrum cant even beat Maple much less JO

JO needs to put some meat on his bones first.

Hell he was Skelator last year, you really think he'll have problems filling out 141? Really?

Muscle yes, body weight no.
You dont think he can put on 8lbs of muscle in 9 months? Really?
"The first lesson of economics is scarcity: There is never enough of anything to satisfy all that want it. The first lesson of politics is to disregard the first lesson of economics" -Thomas Sowell

Offline Viratas

  • Get a Job
  • *
  • Posts: I am a geek!!
    • View Profile
    • http://theopenmat.com
Re: Champs next year
« Reply #58 on: May 16, 2012, 01:48:48 PM »
Well he is from Easton
Aequitas - Veritas (is Latin)
Cóir - Fírinne
Justice - Truth

"College has become a cruel, expensive joke on the poor and the middle class, that benefits only the perpetrator of it." - Peter Gregory

Offline Rockhard

  • LXP
  • Get a Job
  • *
  • Posts: 21051
    • View Profile
    • http://www.theowf.net
Re: Champs next year
« Reply #59 on: May 16, 2012, 02:03:48 PM »
You dont think he can put on 8lbs of muscle in 9 months? Really?

Everyone is different. Some can't, some can.
"Really? Well please tell your father-in-law that he is a freaking idiot."