I'm a high school football official too.
Yes, I understand your point and have thought about it. To be consistent, you must then insist that a team NEVER be excluded from competition for reasons due to recruiting violations. How about the punishment of Ohio State players and Penn State players who were not involved in other types of accusations and subsequent guilty verdicts? In Ohio, high school teams have been punished by actual on field wins being turned into forfeits thus denying uninvolved teammates the opportunity for post season play.
If you do concede that there can be a place for forfeitures, up to including full seasons, I would put intentional violence at the top of the list.
What rankles me is the lack of outcry, from the school, parents, league officials, and Texas state officials. Instead we are hearing EXCUSES. How does the state association get the point across that there is no excuse? Taking the season away gets the point across. I guess I would settle for taking part of it away, but nothing less.